Methods of treating a subject suffering from rheumatoid arthritis based in part on a trained machine learning classifier

Inventors

Ghiassian, SusanMellors, Theodore R.Santolini, MarcAmeli, AsherSchoenbrunner, NancyAkmaev, Viatcheslav R.Johnson, Keith J.

Assignees

Scipher Medicine Corp

Interested in licensing this patent?

MTEC can help explore whether this patent might be available for licensing for your application.

Publication Number

US-11456056-B2

Patent

Publication Date

2022-09-27

Expiration Date


Abstract

Presented herein are systems and methods for developing classifiers useful for predicting response to particular treatments. For example, in some embodiments, the present disclosure provides a method of treating subjects suffering from an autoimmune disorder, the method comprising a step of: administering an anti-TNF therapy to subjects who have been determined to be responsive via a classifier established to distinguish between responsive and non-responsive prior subjects in a cohort who have received the anti-TNF therapy.

Core Innovation

The invention provides systems and methods to predict rheumatoid arthritis responsiveness to anti-TNF therapy using a trained machine learning classifier. Responsiveness versus non-responsiveness is predicted based at least in part on analyzing blood RNA expression levels of a set of genes including ARPC1A, ATAT1, CD27, MORN2, SNX8, SSNA1, and UBL7-AS1.

The trained machine learning classifier distinguishes between responsive and non-responsive subjects who have received the anti-TNF therapy, with performance constraints such as an area under the curve of at least about 70% and, in other independent claims, an accuracy of at least about 90%. The prediction may further be based on the presence of one or more SNPs in an expressed gene sequence and/or at least one clinical characteristic of the subject.

The disclosure also supports treating rheumatoid arthritis by administering an alternative to anti-TNF therapy to a subject predicted to be non-responsive, and administering the anti-TNF therapy to a subject predicted to be responsive. The classifier includes either a neural network or a random forest, and may be trained using rheumatoid arthritis subjects categorized as responsive versus non-responsive to anti-TNF therapy.

Claims Coverage

The independent claims are directed to treating rheumatoid arthritis subjects using anti-TNF therapy versus an alternative therapy based on predictions from a trained machine learning classifier. Across the independent claims, there are four inventive features.

Anti-TNF administration guided by ML responsiveness prediction with AUC constraint

Administering anti-TNF therapy to a subject with rheumatoid arthritis that has been predicted to be responsive based at least in part on a trained machine learning classifier that distinguishes between responsive and non-responsive subjects, with an area under the curve of at least about 70%.

Alternative therapy for ML-predicted non-response based on named gene set

Administering an alternative to anti-TNF therapy to a subject predicted to be non-responsive based at least in part on a trained machine learning classifier distinguishing responsive versus non-responsive subjects based at least in part on analyzing an expression level of a set of genes comprising ARPC1A, ATAT1, CD27, MORN2, SNX8, SSNA1, and UBL7-AS1.

Treatment decision using received expression level, ML prediction, and alternative vs anti-TNF administration

Receiving an expression level in the subject of a set of genes comprising ARPC1A, ATAT1, CD27, MORN2, SNX8, SSNA1, and UBL7-AS1; predicting whether the subject is responsive or non-responsive to an anti-TNF therapy based at least in part on a trained machine learning classifier distinguishing responsive and non-responsive subjects based at least in part on analyzing the expression level in the subject; and administering an alternative to anti-TNF therapy if determined non-responsive, or administering anti-TNF therapy if determined responsive.

Anti-TNF administration guided by ML responsiveness prediction with accuracy constraint

Administering anti-TNF therapy to a subject with rheumatoid arthritis that has been predicted to be responsive based at least in part on a trained machine learning classifier that distinguishes between responsive and non-responsive subjects who have received anti-TNF therapy at an accuracy of at least about 90%.

Across the independent claims, treatment hinges on predictions from a trained machine learning classifier distinguishing responsive versus non-responsive subjects to anti-TNF therapy. The core inventive framework combines gene-expression analysis using a named set of genes, with optional additional inputs such as SNP presence and/or clinical characteristics, classifier implementation as a neural network or a random forest, and performance constraints including AUC at least about 70% and/or accuracy at least about 90%.

Stated Advantages

Predictive performance targets for distinguishing responsive versus non-responsive subjects, including area under the curve of at least about 70% and/or accuracy of at least about 90%.

Capability to guide administering anti-TNF therapy for subjects predicted to be responsive and administering an alternative to anti-TNF therapy for subjects predicted to be non-responsive.

Classifier prediction may achieve negative predictive value constraints of at least about 85% and true negative rate constraints of at least about 60%.

Documented Applications

Treating a subject suffering from rheumatoid arthritis by administering anti-TNF therapy when predicted to be responsive based on a trained machine learning classifier distinguishing responsive versus non-responsive subjects.

Treating a subject suffering from rheumatoid arthritis by administering an alternative to anti-TNF therapy when predicted to be non-responsive based on a trained machine learning classifier.

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST

Stay Connected with MTEC

Keep up with active and upcoming solicitations, MTEC news and other valuable information.