Kurz Pfitzer Wolf
KPW is a specialized law firm focusing on IP and IT law, providing tailored legal advice since 2010. They serve clients ranging from startups to international corporations, offering services in trademark registration, patent law, copyright, and more. Their mission is to protect their clients' rights and interests effectively and efficiently worldwide. They also offer comprehensive legal support in digital and competitive environments, including online platform advice, patent and trademark disputes, and enforcement. Their expertise extends to defending against patent and design infringements, handling patent and trademark applications globally, and advising on software and digital commerce legalities.
Industries
Nr. of Employees
small (1-50)
Kurz Pfitzer Wolf
Services
End‑to‑end trademark filing services including strategic advising, application drafting and filing in national, EU and international registers.
Identity and similarity searches and continuous global monitoring of trademark registers to detect conflicts and support freedom‑to‑operate assessments.
Representation in proceedings to oppose, annul or delete trademarks and designs, including claims based on non‑use or absolute grounds.
Strategic enforcement and defence across trademarks, patents, designs and copyrights, including cease‑and‑desist measures, injunctions and damages claims.
Implementation of border seizure procedures and coordination of cross‑border measures to prevent distribution of counterfeit goods.
Advisory and filing services for design protection and enforcement actions against design infringements, including representation in deletion and nullity proceedings.
End‑to‑end trademark filing services including strategic advising, application drafting and filing in national, EU and international registers.
Identity and similarity searches and continuous global monitoring of trademark registers to detect conflicts and support freedom‑to‑operate assessments.
Representation in proceedings to oppose, annul or delete trademarks and designs, including claims based on non‑use or absolute grounds.
Strategic enforcement and defence across trademarks, patents, designs and copyrights, including cease‑and‑desist measures, injunctions and damages claims.
Implementation of border seizure procedures and coordination of cross‑border measures to prevent distribution of counterfeit goods.
Advisory and filing services for design protection and enforcement actions against design infringements, including representation in deletion and nullity proceedings.
Expertise Areas
- Trademark prosecution and portfolio management
- Trademark clearance and monitoring
- IP enforcement and litigation
- Patent strategy, prosecution coordination and litigation support
Key Technologies
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and generative AI
- Online marketplaces and e‑commerce platforms
- SaaS and cloud software
- Digital advertising and keyword advertising
News & Updates
The German Federal Patent Court declared the German and European patents of Wilhelm Layher GmbH & Co. KG for a scaffolding system invalid.
The German Federal Patent Court confirmed that the name 'Ulmer Münster' can be registered as a trademark if it does not serve as a geographical indication and does not describe the goods or services.
The Hamburg Higher Regional Court clarified the legal requirements for advertising with 'Known from...' in terms of media references and the necessity of providing source references.
The law firm successfully defended a client against a claim for reimbursement of coaching fees, with the court ruling the claim inadmissible.
The German Federal Patent Court declared the German and European patents of Wilhelm Layher GmbH & Co. KG for a scaffolding system invalid.
The Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court ruled that the name 'Homecare Apotheke Deutschland' is not misleading if it only indicates the company's seat in Germany.
The German Federal Patent Court declared the German and European patents of Wilhelm Layher GmbH & Co. KG for a scaffolding system invalid.
The German Federal Patent Court confirmed that the name 'Ulmer Münster' can be registered as a trademark if it does not serve as a geographical indication and does not describe the goods or services.
The Hamburg Higher Regional Court clarified the legal requirements for advertising with 'Known from...' in terms of media references and the necessity of providing source references.
The law firm successfully defended a client against a claim for reimbursement of coaching fees, with the court ruling the claim inadmissible.
The German Federal Patent Court declared the German and European patents of Wilhelm Layher GmbH & Co. KG for a scaffolding system invalid.
The Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court ruled that the name 'Homecare Apotheke Deutschland' is not misleading if it only indicates the company's seat in Germany.